Stronger Together Logan

Stronger Together Logan is a website which helps families in Logan, QLD  support their kids' development. The initiative was created by Logan Together, as part of a broader range of measures to tackle lower levels of child development.

The platform was initially set up in March 2020 during the COVID-19 lockdown in Queensland to provide fun, informative and trustworthy resources for kids and parents.

Following the lockdown, Logan Together wanted to know how the platform could be evolved to support the community's needs better.

Homepage of the new Stronger Together Logan platform

The challenge

Logan is a diverse, fast-growing community in Queensland with approximately 330,000 residents and a broader range of backgrounds than found even in New York City. However, the city has consistently reported lower levels of child development compared to the rest of Queensland and Australia.

Logan Together emerged as a 10-year movement to tackle the persistent disadvantage and developmental vulnerability many children in Logan face.

The team behind Stronger Together Logan wanted to understand:

  1. Whether there was a need for their online platform post-lockdown
  2. How we could evolve it to meet users' needs better
  3. How we could provide a soft entry point for people needing further, more specialised support
Kids in Logan are developmentally more vulnerable
Read "The State of Logan's Children and Families" (2018, Logan Together) for more info.


  • Discovery research
  • Usability testing
  • High fidelity prototype
  • WordPress website


Chris Wood
Lucas Cumsille


Karen Murphy
Product Owner (Logan Together)
Sharon Worboys
Content and PR (Logan Together)
Cassitie Galliott
Head of Delivery (Code for Australia)
Matt Sawkill
Managing Director (Code for Australia)


4 months, part-time



Because several regions of Logan experience systemic disadvantage, getting to talk with local parents 1-1 was a challenge. We worked with the Logan Together backbone team to uncover research opportunities in a way which was respectful of difficulties residents may be facing.

survey respondents
Google analytics

Feedback survey

With the site receiving around 70 sessions per week, our first tactic was to post a feedback survey on the website's homepage for 2 weeks.

We received only one response, and this was submitted by a member of the Logan Together backbone team. Unfortunately, we had to look elsewhere to get the data we needed.


We interviewed three community leaders, four stakeholders and two parents from the site's original focus group.

We uncovered a strong sense of community and trust between parents, a wide range of issues affecting the community, and difficulty accessing information online due to information being very fragmented.

“We’re a family of 6 soon, you know, money doesn’t go very far these days."
“You’ve got to go through 20 different [emergency relief websites] to find one place that’s still operating."

Parent survey

With the help of the owner of a Logan-wide Facebook group for mums, we posted a survey to find out what role social media plays in the community and identify what types of information parents would like to access online. We received 213 responses, 173 of which were parents of at least one child eight years old or younger and were relevant for our platform.

Google analytics

We used Google Analytics to identify which parts of the site were most accessed. We found that most users were landing directly onto a few individual posts, primarily through links on social media, rather than navigating the website starting from the homepage.


Graph of presence vs interest, split into 4 quadrants. The points in the top-right quadrant with the highest presence and interest were local events, parenting advice, and local news.

Types of online content in high demand

From our parent survey, we identified key gaps in the information which parents wanted to access online but currently didn’t access online (quadrant D). We would focus on addressing these topics in Stronger Together Logan:

Playtime activities
Access to local support services
Local pampering opportunities

We also took note of the topics which interested parents and which they currently accessed online (quadrant B). We speculated that we could use content on these topics to help draw parents to Stronger Together Logan and so raise awareness of the support resources available there:

Local events
Local news
Parenting advice

Signs of disconnect with local community

Our survey revealed that more respondents felt disconnected to their community than those who felt connected. In fact, only 18.5% parents said they felt connected to their community (options 4 or 5).

From our discovery interviews, we learned of the importance of families having a good local network, and speculated that this lack of connection could be detrimental.

Bar chart of responses to the question “how connected do you feel to your local community?” The chart is made up of a 5 bars, which are a scale from 1 to 5. Bar number 1 represents “not connected” while bar number 5 represents “very connected.”

Bar 3 is the tallest, accounting for 42.2% of the responses.
Survey responses to the question “How connected do you feel to your local community?"
Bar chart of responses to the question “if you needed some help or advice, where would you look?” 

The chart is made up of 6 bars, which which represent the categories Talk to friends or family, Facebook, Google, Support services, Talk to neighbours, School, and Local neighbourhood centre.

The bar representing "Talk to friends or family” is the tallest, accounting for 85% of the responses.
Survey responses to the question “If you needed some help or advice, where would you look?"

Parents look online for help

78% parents look for help or advice on Facebook, and 76.3% on Google. Only talking to friends or family (85%) was more commonly stated.

This presented a clear opportunity to make information more readily available via these platforms.



I facilitated a remote ideation workshop with 5 stakeholders to brainstorm ways to evolve the Stronger Together Logan platform.

To help ideation workshop participants put themselves in users’s shoes and generate more relevant ideas, I created a persona and 2 empathy maps, built from research insights and assumptions from stakeholders.

Remote co-design workshop
empathy maps
Ideation voting
Workshop participants reviewed insights from the discovery research artefacts
Presenting ideas over video call
We prioritised the top solutions generated in the workshop, tying their value back to Olivia’s needs, the persona we were designing for.


We ideated around two major opportunities identified from our research:

1. How might we make Olivia feel more connected to her community?

2. How might we improve access to support for Olivia?

Participants were given time to review the discovery research insights before doing two rounds of crazy eights, dot voting, creating a solution sketch of the idea they saw most promise in, and finally we categorised the ideas based on effort vs value to Olivia.

Winning solution

Enable Olivia to find support services in her area anonymously online via Ask Izzy

In our research, we found that there was poor online visibility of what support services are available and that many parents were looking online for help.

We decided to test integrating Ask Izzy’s service directory into the platform to help users know where to go for help.


Testing & prototyping

Next, we looked at how we could evolve the Stronger Together Logan platform based on our research insights and the outcome of our ideation workshop.


Iteration 1

The initial mobile prototype

Based on our ideation workshop and our research insights, we identified several goals for the platform’s evolution:

  • Integrate Ask Izzy
  • Improve the organisation of the site
  • Provide access to events online
  • Provide access to local pampering opportunities

We created a low-fidelity prototype to accommodate for these goals, ready for usability testing.

Our first iteration, ready for usability testing

Navigating the site

How would you browse local events?

“Not sure."

Our first tester could find almost none of the content on the site. Seeing this critical issue, we iterated immediately to try and make easier for testers to navigate the site.

We added page links at the top of the homepage
17 out of 17 testers used these links to find their way around the site
Diagram showing the navigation links being added near the top of the homepage, just underneath the hero section.

Pivoting from offers to places to visit

We created an offers section based on the need for “local pampering opportunities.” However, when we tested this section, we received mixed opinions. We also had reservations about how it could be built and maintained.

By contrast, 3 out of 8 of our testers suggested having local parks or playgroups on the website.

“It’s really hard to find good parks."
We replaced the offers section with a directory of nearby parks and attractions
9 out of 9 testers would use the site to find places to visit
Diagram showing the “Places to visit” wireframe, which determines the user’s location and then shows nearby places of interest. In the image, the first result is “Beenleigh Aquatic Centre” in the category “Sports centres” and it is 3 kilometres away.
Left: Initial prototype, with location-based offers. Right: Second iteration, with nearby parks, sports centres and playgroups instead.

Fitting our testers’ mental model

A key challenge was understanding where users expected to see the different types of content on the site and how they differentiated them.

We learnt that users distinguish places and events by how often they can be accessed. Something which runs weekly, for example a playgroup, was seen as a place to visit, whereas something which runs monthly or one-off was seen as an event.

We reorganised the information architecture using testers’ feedback
In the final iteration, 5 out of 5 testers could correctly guess the type of content they would see on each page
Places to visit
Sports clubs
One-off events
Family fun days
Community events
Recurring events
Things to do at home
Sport & exercise videos
Playtime activites
Educational activities
The final information architecture, informed by tester fedback

Iteration 4

Features of the final prototype


Final prototype

"It's perfect, because there's just so many places you can go to and get information. If you've got everything in one place, then you don't need to go anywhere else."
“It’s not just set up because it needs to be set up; it’s set up to actually help people."
“I really like the colours and the design of it - I think it’s really good. It’s very clear, it’s not too overwhelming when you look at it."
“What you’re aiming for with this site would suit me to a T. I really like how it’s designed."


"The people that were recruited totally nailed the brief and did a great job working well as a team. They’ve been able to listen, find out and develop something that we need."
Karen Murphy
Karen Murphy
Product Owner (Logan Together)

After presenting the prototype and testing feedback to the stakeholders, they were excited to proceed with the project build.

Lucas developed the website in WordPress and we provided Logan Together with a digital guide on Notion, including video walkthroughs and a section for external collaborators who want to add their own events and local places to the platform.

We helped migrate old content over, and Logan Together is currently content populating the website with events and places to visit before launching it.

Would you like to work together?